Understanding Zimbabwe’s Statecraft: Navigating the Pathway for Opposition Success.
By Youngerson Matete
Zimbabwe: When Democracy’s Trappings Mask a Harder Reality.
Zimbabwe stands as a stark reminder that the trappings of democracy – elections, constitutions, opposition parties – can sometimes cloak a much harder reality. For decades ZANU-PF, has meticulously constructed a resilient edifice of control, far surpassing mere electoral malpractices. For Zimbabwe's opposition movements, understanding and dismantling this sophisticated statecraft isn't just a political challenge; it's the prerequisite for any meaningful political breakthrough and those yearning for genuine change, understanding this intricate architecture isn't just an academic exercise; it's the essential first step towards dismantling it. This goes beyond targeting to win a single election; it's about confronting a system designed to defeat the purpose of elections. A system that scholars like Masunungure (2021) describe as a sophisticated form of competitive authoritarianism.
Deconstructing the Pillars: The Anatomy of ZANU-PF's Dominance
ZANU-PF’s statecraft is anchored on four key pillars which it has used over the years to preserve power ; institutional manipulation, coercions and securitization , patronage and clientelism, as well as ideological hegemony.
Institutional Manipulation: The Façade of Democracy.
State institutions ostensibly exist to serve the people, but in Zimbabwe they are subtly bent towards perpetuating the rule of a single party. This is Zimbabwe's reality. For example the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, rather than being an impartial electoral body, often appears to tilt the playing field significantly towards the ruling party. A flawed voter rolls, opaque processes, and constituency boundaries drawn to favor one party. The courts, frequently seem less like temples of justice and more like instruments of political convenience, used to harass critics or stall challenges until the moment passes, reflecting what scholars term the weaponization of the judiciary (Chikwanha, 2020).
Meanwhile, the state’s voice booms from its media monopoly. Newspapers like The Herald and the airwaves of ZBC overwhelmingly sing the praises of ZANU-PF while painting opposition voices as marginal or treacherous, reinforcing the party's ideological hegemony as stated by Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2020). This controlled narrative is especially potent in areas with limited access to independent information. And underpinning it all is the profound entanglement of the security sector – the military, police, and intelligence agencies – with the ruling party. Bound by shared history, patronage, and ideology, this "securocracy," as Chitiyo and Rupiya (2020) have explored, acts as the ultimate guarantor, a silent reminder that the cost of challenging the status quo can be perilously high.
Coercion and Securitization: The Ever-Present Threat.
Fear, too, is a carefully managed tool. While notorious laws like POSA and AIPPA have been replaced, their spirit lives on in new legislation like the MOPA, Patriotic Act, PVO act, cyber security and data protection act. New legislation, draped in the language of "patriotism" and "order," grants sweeping powers to silence dissent, restrict assembly, and surveil citizens, perpetuating a cycle of securitization. Violence, though not constant, is strategically deployed – around elections, during protests. Abductions, beatings, and the menacing presence of party-aligned militias create a climate of apprehension, whispering warnings that discourage participation and choke dissent before it fully forms.
Patronage and Clientelism: The Economics of Loyalty.
Yet, perhaps the most pervasive pillar is the economy of loyalty. Vast networks distribute the state's resources – land, mining rights, government contracts, even food aid during droughts – not based on need or merit, but on allegiance, a system of patronage and clientelism. We have seen a lot of public figures aligned to the ruling party ZANU PF being treated with top of range vehicles by scrupulous characters like Wicknell Chivhayo and tenders being dubiously awarded to corrupt political exposed persons. This is part of an entrenched system of autocracy.
In rural areas especially, where dependence on the state can be acute, this weaponizes poverty, fragmenting communities and making opposition support a potentially costly choice. Grand corruption, siphoning national wealth into the pockets of the connected few, enriches the elite while binding them tighter to the regime that enables their privilege.
Ideological Hegemony: Controlling the Narrative.
ZANU-PF aggressively positions itself as the sole legitimate heir to the anti-colonial liberation struggle. It conflates party, state, and nation, framing its continued rule as essential for safeguarding sovereignty and the gains of independence. The opposition is systematically portrayed as inauthentic, unpatriotic, and puppets of hostile Western powers seeking "regime change." This narrative resonates with nationalist sentiments and historical grievances, effectively tarring legitimate criticism and alternative policy proposals as treasonous. Loyalty to ZANU-PF is presented as synonymous with loyalty to Zimbabwe itself. Criticizing the party or its leadership becomes framed as an attack on the nation.
Dismantling the Architecture: A Multi-Front Strategy Grounded in Comparative Success.
Overcoming such an entrenched system demands more than fleeting electoral enthusiasm. It requires a sustained, multi-generational effort, a strategy that learns not only from Zimbabwe's own struggles but from the hard-won victories of others facing similar giants.
Forging Unshakeable Unity and Credible Alternatives: The Bedrock of Challenge.
The most fundamental need is for the opposition to find a unity deeper than shared dislike of the current rulers. Chronic fragmentation, fueled by personalities and regional divides, has been a debilitating weakness, a point consistently emphasized by many analyzing opposition dynamics. What’s needed are durable coalitions built on shared principles, internal democracy, and a genuinely compelling vision for the future. This vision must move beyond critique to offer tangible hope – credible plans to revive the economy, crush corruption, rebuild institutions, and deliver basic services. Look to Zambia’s recent shift: Hakainde Hichilema’s success, as Cheeseman (2021) observed, wasn't just about opposing Edgar Lungu; it was about uniting a broad coalition around a relentless focus on economic suffering and a credible promise of competent, democratic governance. Unity, backed by substance, resonates.
Building Sustained Social Movements: The Engine of Endurance.
Electoral moments alone are vulnerable to manipulation. True change is forged in the daily grind of building resilient social movements. This means deep, sustained community organising – listening to local grievances about water, land, jobs, and schools; building trust; training activists in non-violent resistance; and creating networks of solidarity that can withstand intimidation. Protecting and expanding independent sources of information – robust online platforms – is vital to counter the state’s propaganda monopoly. Malawi’s journey is instructive. Lazarus Chakwera’s eventual victory was preceded and underpinned by months of relentless, peaceful mass protests. Organized by a powerful coalition of civil society, churches, and opposition supporters, these demonstrations (#MotiDemos) kept the flame of resistance alive, showcased the popular will, and crucially, provided the legitimacy and momentum that forced the courts to overturn a fraudulent election result, demonstrating the power of sustained civic action (Dulani and Sambo, 2020). Further afield, Serbia’s Otpor! movement showed how disciplined non-violence, unifying symbols, and mobilizing diverse groups – students alongside workers and farmers – could steadily erode the legitimacy of an autocrat.
Strategic Engagement with Institutions: Domestically and Internationally.
Engaging with the system requires both courage and cunning. Domestically, pursuing strategic litigation, even when expecting defeat, serves a purpose. It exposes abuses, creates a formal record of wrongdoing, and occasionally yields unexpected victories or procedural wins. Meticulously documenting human rights violations, electoral fraud, and corruption is the essential fuel for both domestic and international advocacy. While Zimbabwe’s institutions are captured, looking to neighbours like South Africa , where the judiciary has occasionally demonstrated independence from the executive, offers a glimpse of what reformed institutions could aspire to be.
Regionally and internationally, persistent engagement is paramount. The struggle needs allies. Drawing inspiration from the global anti-apartheid movement, Zimbabwean democrats must systematically build international solidarity – lobbying regional bodies like SADC and the AU with irrefutable evidence of violations, pushing them beyond rhetoric towards meaningful diplomatic pressure and credible election observation, leveraging the frameworks of competitive authoritarianism described by Levitsky and Way (2010). Engaging international civil society, parliaments, and democratic governments to apply targeted pressure – sanctions aimed at key enablers; diplomatic isolation; support for independent media and activists – can create significant leverage. The flawed but crucial 2008-2013 Government of National Unity, forced upon ZANU-PF by regional pressure after horrific electoral violence, stands as proof that external influence, though complex, is possible.
Countering the Hegemonic Narrative: Reclaiming Patriotism.
Crucially, the opposition must reclaim the narrative. ZANU-PF’s hegemonic story needs a powerful counter-story. Patriotism must be redefined as loyalty to the people of Zimbabwe, to the constitution, and to the nation’s well-being – not blind allegiance to a party, actively challenging the conflation critiqued by scholars like Tendi (2010). This involves celebrating Zimbabwean identity while separating it from ZANU-PF’s partisan ownership. The message must resonate on a human level. As Nic Cheeseman (2018) emphasizes, successful opposition focuses relentlessly on the tangible, everyday struggles: the crippling cost of living, the desperate search for work, the crumbling hospitals, the theft by corruption. Connecting these daily hardships directly to the failures of governance makes the critique far more potent than abstract ideals alone. Every available channel – social media, independent radio, street art, music – must be used to bypass the state’s megaphone and carry this message of inclusive hope and shared struggle directly to the people. I do not understand why up to now opposition or those yearning for democracy do not a have a podcast or online radio to counter the ZANU PF megaphones in an era of internet.
Exploiting Internal Rifts and Economic.
Finally, the opposition must be attuned to the cracks within the fortress. The very patronage system that sustains ZANU-PF also breeds intense factionalism, particularly when leadership succession looms. Understanding these internal dynamics and finding ways to exploit the inevitable rivalries is crucial. Moreover, Zimbabwe’s perpetual economic crisis – the hyperinflation, the currency chaos, the unemployment – is the regime’s most glaring vulnerability. This suffering stems directly from state capture and mismanagement. The opposition’s task is to relentlessly link this economic pain to its true source. The failures and predation of ZANU-PF rule. As Zambia showed, even traditional strongholds can crumble when economic despair becomes overwhelming, proving that economic messaging remains a potent tool.
The Long Arc of Change.
There are no illusions about the difficulty ahead. Dismantling such deeply entrenched power is a marathon, demanding immense strategic patience, unwavering commitment, and constant adaptation, a journey requiring the long-term perspective. It requires transcending the cycle of reactive electioneering and building a movement that is broad-based, deeply rooted in communities, and resilient enough to endure setbacks and repression.
This movement must fight simultaneously on multiple fronts: forging genuine unity around a credible future; embedding itself in the fabric of society through sustained organising; strategically challenging abuses while building international alliances; powerfully countering the regime’s narrative with one of inclusive hope; and expertly exploiting the inevitable weaknesses born of the regime’s own corruption and economic failures.
The experiences of neighbours like Malawi and Zambia offer recent, tangible proof that change is possible, even against formidable odds, reinforcing the lessons of comparative politics. They show the power of unity, the engine of sustained social movements, and the resonance of focusing on the crushing weight of economic hardship and misrule. Serbia and others remind us of the potent force of disciplined non-violence and youth engagement.
The path for Zimbabwe’s opposition is undoubtedly arduous, paved with obstacles and fraught with risk. Yet, by drawing strength from its own people, heeding the insights of its scholars, and strategically applying the hard-won lessons of comparative struggles, a democratic future remains more than a distant dream. It is a demanding, but navigable, reality. The journey begins with understanding the fortress, but its success hinges on the courage, unity, and unwavering perseverance of those determined to build something new.
Youngerson Matete is a multi-award-winning pro-democracy and Human Rights activist, a Mandela Washington Fellowship Alumni, and a student of human rights and Politics. He is the founder of Project Vote 263, African Network For Democracy, National Constitutional Movement, and The School of Governance and Center For Democracy. He writes in his own capacity. His views doesn't represent any organization.
Cell: +263 773 622 044
Email:youngmatete0@gmail.com/ director@projectvote263.org.zw
Comments